When I started reading the terms and conditions, I admit I was a little frightened. They are pages and pages (and pages and pages) long, or so it seemed. After calming down and taking a closer look, I realized that this site was simply more thorough than some of the other sites. This is not a bad thing.
On to the content:
1) Keyword "orchid": While most of the backgrounds are black or white, there are several multicolored backgrounds. There's potential here, but some of these arrangements are very "editorial", if that makes sense. Also, there isn't much experimentation regarding depth of field (where some flowers would appear sharp and in the foreground, while others are more blurred and in the background). I would likely prefer to go out and shoot new content before submitting any orchid shots to this website, except for:
2) Butterfly - Many of these shots are what I would classify as "cutesy". Some of my newer pictures could work here, including:
3) Abstract - not a fit at all.
4) Nature - I think my work is a little too "soft" for this category. So, I tried "flowers". Yeah, not so much, either.
5) Travel - Most definitely not.
Not willing to give up so easily, I flipped through some of the other categories. Architecture abstract? Maybe. Churches? Quite possible, something like this:
I didn't see any pictures like this at all. So, there's a chance there.
Overall, though, this was about a below average fit for me. I'd have to think about it.
Tomorrow - Shutterstock - did I save the best for last?
No comments:
Post a Comment